pv magazine test, April 2024 results

Share

 

Due to a monitoring system malfunction, parts of the data for some modules in the first half of April 2024 can’t be used and have been removed to ensure that the performance results are comparable. Two new products – a heterojunction (HJT) module from Akcome and a tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) module from Longi – have been added to the field and their indoor test reports have been uploaded on the website. The first chart above shows the meteo station data (irradiance, ambient temperature) for April 2024. The average bifacial boost was 8.18% for April 2024. Bifacial boost refers to the relative advantage of the average specific energy yield of all bifacial products compared to the average specific energy yield of all mono passivated emitter rear contact (PERC) products.

Monthly highlights

Four TOPCon and two HJT bifacial panels are grouped in the first rank as their results are close to each other. HJT products haven’t shown better performance but their average yield is roughly 0.5% higher than TOPCon, which is within our measurement tolerance. Older bifacial PERC panels have yields that are close to the more advanced negatively-doped, “n-type” modules. We need more products and more data to be able to draw safer conclusions on how these technologies compare.

Bifacial boost

All in Wh/WpTotal January 2024Total February 2024Total March 2024Total April 2024
Average monthly yield41.6267.98128.8767.53
Average monthly bifacial yield42.3771.17132.6869.69
Average monthly monofacial PERC yield40.6764.50124.0164.42
Operation days15273014
Average daily yield2.772.524.304.82
Average daily bifacial yield2.822.644.424.98
Average daily monofacial PERC yield2.712.394.134.60
Bifacial TOPCon boost4.51%9.20%7.11%8.69%
Bifacial HJT boost3.66%12.09%7.47%9.04%
Bifacial PERC boost3.88%11.02%6.32%7.30%
All technologies bifacial boost4.17%10.35%7.00%8.18%

 

Specific energy yield ranking of n-type bifacial TOPCon and HJT modules

#Installation monthProductTypeSample selection methodTotal
April 2024 Wh/Wp
April 2024 Rank
462024/3/1Trina TSM-NEG9RC.27n-TOPCon370.991
562024/4/7Longi LR5-72HGD-585Mn-TOPCon370.421
552024/4/7Akcome SKA611HDGDC-715n-HJT370.421
432024/4/3Tongwei TWMND-72HD570n-TOPCon370.241
512023/10/31Risen RSM132-8-700BHDGn-HJT370.081
502023/9/1Astronergy CHSM72N(DG)/F-BH-580n-TOPCon369.951
272023/6/5Jolywood JW-D72N-400n-TOPCon369.842
422023/6/5DAS DH144NAn-TOPCon369.702
532023/11/15SEG SEG-575-BTA-BGn-TOPCon368.992

 

Specific energy yield ranking of bifacial PERC modules

#Installation monthProductTypeSample selection methodTotal April 2024 Wh/WpApril 2024 rank
372021/5/1LONGi LR4-72HBD-445MPERC370.981
282020/4/15Risen RSM144-6-405BMDGPERC369.412
412022/12/18Tongwei TH550PMB6-58SDCPERC169.162
322021/7/1Risen RSM150-8-500BMDGPERC168.742
382021/10/18LONGi LR5-72HBD-535MPERC368.592
342021/7/1JA JAM72D20-445MBPERC267.873

 

Specific energy yield ranking of monofacial modules

#Installation monthProductTypeSample selection methodTotal
August 2024 Wh/Wp
August 2024. Rank
522023/11/7Longi LR5-72-HTHF-585P-type* back contact1139.061
482023/9/26Longi LR5-72-HTH 585P-type* back contact1138.431
352021/7/1JA JAM72S20-445MRMonofacial PERC2137.141
312020/10/1JA JAM60S10-345/MRPERC2137.001
442023/9/1AIKO A600-MAF72MwN-type back contact3136.612
302020/7/7GCL GCL-M3/72H380Cast PERC1136.102
102018/5/24Recom RCM-275-6MB-4-BB21Mono1135.062
292020/7/7CSI CS3U-390MSPERC2134.932
222019/5/4Znshine ZXP6-60-275/PMulti1133.973
362021/11/20JA JAM72S30-540MRPERC2133.813
202018/11/21Phono PS380MH-24/THPERC1133.743
Note: sample selection method categorization: Sample 1 randomly selected by CEA from a large production lot; Sample 2 purchased from the market by CEA; Sample 3 provided by supplier, without random selection. *New module. **P-type = positively doped.

 

RankEnergy yield related to top performer in each category
1Product has 100%-98.5% of the yield of the top performer
2Product has 100%-98.5% of the yield of the next best performer below the last product listed in rank 1
3Product has 100%-98.5% of the yield of the next best performer below the last product listed in rank 2
4Product has less than 98.5% of the yield of the next best performer below the last product listed in rank 3

 

Energy yield measurements

  • The energy yield comparison among various technology, including bifacial boost, is analyzed using products installed after the beginning of 2019.
  • The energy yield is given in Wh/Wp and calculated by dividing the energy produced by the module by the maximum power (Pmax) at standard test conditions (STC) of the module. This Pmax is the maximum STC power after a process of stabilization.
  • The results are grouped in categories, per solar module type.
  • The bifacial boost depends on a number of parameters: the bifaciality factor, the installation geometry, the albedo of the ground, the sun angle, and diffuse irradiance. The ground, in this case, is gray gravel.

 

Test cooperation

pv magazine test is a cooperative effort ­involving pv magazine, CEA, Gsolar, and Hoymiles. All testing procedures are carried out at Gsolar’s test laboratory in Xi’an, China. CEA supervises these tests and designed both the indoor and outdoor testing procedures.

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.