The solar manufacturing industry will consolidate in 2024, after oversupply and falling material costs drove a downstream price war in the second half of 2023. Smaller, tier-2 and tier-3 manufacturers with below-cost module prices will continue to face negative margins. Tier-1 Chinese manufacturers have also been affected by the crash in average selling prices and are trying to differentiate themselves from competitors with either innovative products or exceptional prices.
As a result, thin or negative margins will continue to make 2024 a challenging year for manufacturers, and the more-than 75% market share held by the 10 biggest polysilicon, wafer, cell, and module companies is set to grow.
Inventory issues
The least diversified solar distributors and installers are at risk because of price-fall-related write-offs in their extensive inventories, particularly in Europe. At the end of 2023, the total European module inventory exceeded that year’s installations. Despite the excess inventory in Europe over the last two years, there are no signs of a strong decline in shipments from mainland China in 2024.
Manufacturers and distributors are using strategies such as fire sales, reshipping, and longer payment terms to reduce inventory and help customers cope. A recent report from S&P Global Commodity Insights predicted that a normalization of module inventory in Europe will not happen before 2025.
Technology shift
Oversupply and thin manufacturer margins are forcing solar companies to accelerate product technology changes, such as from passivated emitter rear cell (PERC) to tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) panels. PERC technology will be phased out by 2025, with the exception of a few markets.
In 2024, two out of three modules shipped will be based on negatively-doped, “n-type” technology. The change from positively-doped, “p-type” to n-type shipments will happen faster in Europe as warehouses still have plenty of p-type imports from last year that are selling slowly. By contrast, n-type modules have a far better chance of selling at current price levels, due to their better performance.
Mind the gap
This new oversupply cycle has direct implications on policy efforts to reshore solar supply chains in the United States and Europe. After declines in module raw material costs, the production cost gap has only widened across regions. In the first quarter of 2024, average costs in mainland China were 45 – when indexing United States costs as 100 (see chart below). A year ago, Chinese costs were closer to costs in Europe and the United States, at 67.
It has become increasingly difficult and expensive to build manufacturing capacity in Western countries, jeopardizing ongoing localization efforts and the survival of existing local manufacturing bases. Incentives included in local-manufacturing packages, such as the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), might now prove insufficient to boost US domestic solar manufacturing capacity and the competitiveness of domestic players.
India has emerged as a country with competitive cost structures, allowing the subcontinent to lead solar manufacturing expansion outside mainland China. In addition to manufacturers attracted by production-linked incentives, new entrants are making modules, stimulated by opportunities to manufacture in India and ship to international markets, especially the United States.
The cost gap may not be the only challenge to reshoring policy. TOPCon is quickly becoming the dominant market technology and more than 90% of the market is based in China, where companies have invested in the approach for the last two years.
By contrast, most of the manufacturing capacity located in Western countries and India is PERC technology, which will soon be phased out. Upgrading older production lines or building new capacity entails large investment that many Western manufacturers will find very difficult. Ultimately, in this context, reshoring module manufacturing in the United States or Europe would be the easiest option if n-type cells can be imported.
These tough times will continue for Western solar manufacturers as bulging overcapacity in China shows no sign of abating, putting Western companies at risk of falling behind on technological development.
S&P Global Commodity Insights expects the global manufacturing base to continue growing at a faster pace than demand, and most of these expansions will occur in China. In the next two years, manufacturers will add 300 GW of annual solar module production capacity – the equivalent of more than 70% of total global demand during 2023.
How easily shipments from this massive new capacity reach international markets is something that remains to be seen. In 2024, the solar industry will face another global wave of policy in key markets including the United States, Europe, and India. Examples include the new foreign subsidy investigations opened by the European Union, the implementation of the restrictive Approved List of Models and Manufacturers for government projects in India; and in the United States, the end of an antidumping duty and countervailing duty moratorium, and the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act.
Those moves will determine not only the fate of ongoing onshoring efforts in those regions but also the shape of global supply chains as they adapt to continue serving core markets.
About the author: Edurne Zoco is executive director in the Clean Energy Technology group at S&P Global Commodity Insights. She leads research across solar, supply chains, and carbon sequestration.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
It may be altruistic, but at some point is something cheap enough? If shipping and tariffs are factored in, are Chinese panels still cheaper at a US jobsite? US solar electricity needs a lower LCOE than natural gas to compete, and it competes even better when firmed with batteries. Batteries can provide grid services with or without PV.
China can sell all the panels it wants to the 140 countries in the world without domestic PV manufacturing.
India is about 42% more expensive to manufacture compared to mainland China. So be it. Indian government is already giving incentives and specifies Indian made solar panel for government sponsored projects including the recent roof top solar free electricity project. Hence, Indian manufacturers should take heart and start producing wafers in India. Adani are already reported to be making their own ingots and wafers. Others should follows. May be with gain knowledge of manufacture an localisation, the gap with China will narrow down. India will become competitive. From my own experience of making ingots and wafers back in the 1990s, I am sure we will win.