From pv magazine USA
The detained shipment of product seized under the recently-enacted Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) by U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), first reported by ROTH Capital Partners, is believed to be product from JinkoSolar, according to reports shared with pv magazine USA by trusted industry sources.
According to the initial Roth note, the detained shipment is being withheld until the vendor provides documentation showing the source of the quartzite, the raw material for making polysilicon, though the vendor at the time was not named.
pv magazine has reached out to Jinko for comment on the detained shipment reports, and will provide said comment once it is received.
If the reports are confirmed, the result could be a much more dire situation than was initially regarded when the Department of Homeland Security Office of Strategy, Policy, and Plans released its June 17 strategy for preventing the importation of goods mined or produced using forced labor under the UFLPA.
Under that plan, only a handful of polysilicon suppliers with operations in Xinjiang were listed, along with MGS supplier Hoshine Silicon, and the action was seen as a best-case scenario for the solar industry, with other companies thought to be at risk left off the list of banned imports.
It was also believed by ROTH at the time that companies that have already gone through the Hoshine WRO enforcement process would not be a focus of initial UFLPA enforcement, though the reported detention of Jinko product would prove this belief inaccurate.
The issue of quartzite documentation is an especially tricky one, as ROTH shares that, to its knowledge, none of the module vendors have quartzite documentation, and that two of the leading suppliers, Wacker and Hemlock semiconductor, would currently find it difficult to provide this information. It is possible that this is information the companies could provide, but doing so would take time. If the reports are confirmed, untold capacity of U.S.-bound product shipments could now be in jeopardy.
The same sources who provided reports on potentially detained Jinko shipments also believe that Trina Solar has had product detained, and pv magazine has reached out to Trina for comment on these additional reports.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
2 comments
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.