From pv magazine USA
Solar modules that last 50 years with very little degradation will significantly increase the value of solar power projects. In an example below, we see how the discounted cash flow from a project’s electricity generation increases by 46% when shifting the project from today’s standard 25-year lifetime to a 50-year time scale. This low degradation value results from the near perfect seal that a pure glass-glass encapsulated solar panel offers compared to a standard glass-plastic backsheet product.
We will have solar panels that are guaranteed to last 50 years with little degradation. In fact, these panels are likely being installed right now.
In recent conversations with Meyer Burger’s CEO, Erfurt Gunter, it was mentioned that the company’s glass-glass bifacial solar panel showed virtually no degradation during its durability testing. But a number had to be chosen for the warranty, so the company’s power production warranty states that Meyer Burger will replace the solar panel if its generation falls below 93.2% of its original capacity after 30 years.
The U.S. Department of Energy funded 50-year glass-glass solar panel research in 2018, and recently funded two projects looking at inverter failure and operations and maintenance as plants reach the half century mark.
The program, Towards50, is led by Dr. Roger French. French has been publishing papers on this research, and told pv magazine USA that degradation levels below 0.2% per year suggest that the possibility of 50-year solar panels is very real. We will cover these papers in depth in later articles.
Running the numbers
Investors pay for the “net present value” of full earnings, minus all costs, subtracting an estimation of figure interest rates from those earnings. The point to remember is that investors pay for this value at the moment they buy the asset, decades before that cash arrives.
Thus, when calculating the discounted cash flow of a solar power project, this value can be predicted and sold. In our case, a solar power project that generates 1,000,000 kWh per year of electricity that is sold at 4 cents/kWh with a 2% electricity inflation rate, generates a discounted cash flow of $677,357 in the project’s first 25 years.
If the site were to continue running for another 25 years, that would add $316,357 in discounted electricity revenue to the value of the project. This represents a 46.8% increase over the first 25 years of the project. A substantial fraction of this money would be paid to the solar developer when construction is complete.
There will be arguments from investors on what discount rate should be used, and what should be paid for the project’s net present value, as we attempt to forecast several decades into the future of a complex world.
However, an electricity inflation clause which protects investor revenue can be added to any solar power purchase agreement. This clause also protects the energy buyer’s savings by guaranteeing that the inflation is always lower than actual electricity inflation.
There are multiple indications that investors are already banking on 50-year timeframes for solar power projects. A power grid interconnection’s value goes far beyond the current 25 year lifetime of solar panels. In fact, the value goes on in perpetuity.
This was recently shown when a Portuguese renewable auction drew record low bids. Local commentators suggested that the reason the bid price was below the hard costs of a solar power project was that while the electricity contract was short – 15 years – the land and interconnection rights were indefinitely long. Investors clearly were betting that they could make up for their low bid prices over the long term.
Bloomberg New Energy Finance’s Jenny Chase has likened the value of an interconnection on the power grid to “gold dust” sprinkled atop the value of a solar power plant’s original power purchase agreement.
This author has seen long term solar land lease agreements offered to Midwest farmers with 25-year contracts, including a developer’s option on a second 25-year extension of the original land lease period. Most other electricity generation assets have 40-year lifetimes and longer. And nuclear power plants in the U.S. are now seeking the opportunity to run for 80 years.
So, what will you be doing in 2071?
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
1 comment
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.