Between Christmas and New Year, South Australia got another glimpse of its 100% renewably powered future, when solar and wind generation made up 99.6% of electricity in the grid on December 27, as tracked by OpenNEM.
Although much of the affected population was in Christmas recovery at the time, PV technology consultant Pierre Verlinden, a former VP and Chief Scientist at Trina Solar in China, but now based back in South Australia’s McLaren Vale, posted the moment on LinkedIn and began answering questions from the worldwide clean-energy-interested community.
He noted that South Australia has seen a steady increase in the penetration of renewables over the past 13 years, with an absolute increase of 4.5% per annum, leading to an average contribution of renewable generation over 2020 of 59%.
Therefore, he extrapolated, “I would expect 63.5% in 2021 and 100% by 2030.”
AEMO’s South Australian Electricity Report for the financial year 2019/2020, released in November, attributed 42.9% of the 59.6% renewable penetration in South Australia to wind generation, and 15.7% to solar generation (11.6% rooftop).
The keys to the renewable castle
As Verlinden says, “The keys to 100% renewables is a good combination of diversity of sources, storage and interconnection of the network.”
So although the renewable contribution in the state so far is stellar by world standards — and for an hour on October 11 solar generation actually supplied 100% of South Australia’s electricity — diversification of renewable sources and stronger interconnection with the rest of the National Electricity Market are necessary further developments on the road to continuous 100% generation.
“The good characteristics of South Australia are that there is very good decoupling of wind and solar PV,” wrote Verlinden on LinkedIn, who contrasted the resources with those of California, “where wind energy is very much synchronous with solar”.
Nonetheless, rampaging solar generation, which the South Australian Electricity Report documented as increasing by 35% from the financial year 2018/19, has caused daytime meltdowns when supply outstrips demand, such that the state government saw it necessary to rush in regulations to allow centralized disconnection of rooftop supply to support grid stability.
Ultimately, the flexible autonomous control by inverters of rooftop-solar exports to the grid will allow a more balanced supply-demand scenario, and an ARENA-funded trial is currently underway — involving SA Power Networks, SwitchDin smart software solutions and Fronius, SMA and SolarEdge inverter manufacturers — to test and hopefully scale such a system, which would enable continued connection of rooftop solar systems sized to suit the householder, not the limitations of the network.
What’s in store!
Verlinden also refers to the stabilizing influence of batteries: notably South Australia’s 150 MW Hornsdale Power Reserve, which since its first 100 MW stage was connected to the grid in 2017, has responded to major system outages and helped the network surf variability in renewable supply.
Residential and commercial batteries, especially when linked to smart energy-flow controllers capable of responding to grid signals, will also help smooth network supply and demand.
“Currently,” notes Verlinden, “the state is using a minimum of 200 MW of continuous gas-powered source to maintain the grid voltage, and a back of ~1,500 MW of gas-powered generators.”
When you factor in exports
Interestingly, South Australia’s existing connection to the long arm of the NEM has facilitated exports to other states equal to 2.8% of generation, so the state actually generated renewable energy equal to 61.3% of its consumption.
On the subject of interconnection, 2020 saw Project EnergyConnect, a long-planned 875-kilometer transmission line between South Australia and New South Wales, clear another regulatory hurdle in the required several-year process to delivery.
Should the $2.5 billion project go ahead, and not be overtaken by a conga line of batteries delivering virtual transmission, or pipelines of renewable hydrogen — it is taking so long that such eventualities are not totally in the realm of the ridiculous — it will enable still greater resilience to South Australia’s variable renewable generation allowing supply and demand to be distributed across different geographic regions, and a wider range of renewable generation and storage projects including Snowy 2.0.
At the start of this new year, South Australia, says Verlinden, still has a “very weak” interconnection with other states and no renewable-energy sources besides prodigious wind and growing solar (that’s discounting a 3 MW dribble of hydroelectric capacity provided by SA Water’s Terminal Storage Mini Hydro system at Tea Tree Gully).
In short, he writes, “the transformation of the energy economy is far from finished”.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
Interesting, and as always a “but”.
BUT: Something must power the state for the other two thirds of the day.
Given that ignorance has shunned the modern nuclear process, then “Traditional” baseload and topping generation, ie: coal and gas fired must exist to supply reliable and more than adequate energy.
SO: The end effect is that DUAL systems have been created that (by factors) increase the cost of electricity.
AND the benefit? NONE!
WHY? Because fickle sources of generation AT BEST can supply power for a third of a day, and emissions from coal fired power stations are not reduced because their furnaces by necessity must operate IRRESPECTIVE of transient inputs from “Renewables”.
The ONLY grace is emissions reduction from normally gas fired topping and peaking generation.
I am an experienced engineer – the above is BASIC, CDF knowledge — knowledge clearly ignored by Green zealots, Politicians and the ignorant – all akin to Don Quixote slaying windmills.
Clearly I am one who does not share your enthusiasm – but am open to being told why I am wrong.
Peter Cunningham
The article demonstrates more than a third of the day powered by renewables. On this you are wrong. SA doesn’t even have coal.
Also, nuclear cannot supply 100% by itself. It’s slow ramping and expensive capital costs mean you need peaking plant.
Get off your nuclear fantasy – the tech is expensive and stagnant. Peak nuclear market share was in 1992.