The Turkish Solar Energy Society, Solarbaba tells pv magazine the country installed around 1.7 GW of new solar PV capacity in 2017.
Of this, Ates Ugurel, founder of Turkey’s Solarbaba, says, roughly 99% belongs to the so-called unlicensed segment of the solar market, with just 15 MW added via the licensed market, which comprises tendered PV plants larger than 1 MW.
In 2016 and 2015, Turkey added just 571 MW and 248.8 MW of new capacity, respectively. By the end of 2017, Turkey's cumulative solar PV capacity stood at 2.647 GW.
2018 is a crucial year
A year ago, Ugurel told pv magazine that 2017 would be a strong year for Turkey’s solar industry, due to the capacity of approved non-licensed projects, which he calculated to be “between 1.5 GW to 2.5 GW at most.” The newly added PV capacity in 2017 confirms Ugural’s initial calculations.
At the time, he also said growth in 2018 onwards might be at risk, due to a spike in the fee for unlicensed projects, which have to pay power distribution companies for transporting the generated solar power.
Therefore, 2018 appears to be a crucial year for Turkey’s solar PV sector.
Tendered licenses remain dormant
A characteristic of the Turkish PV market in both 2017 and 2016, is that a negligible amount of the 600 MW of tendered PV capacity has been installed.
Specifically, just 15 MW and 13.3 MW of licensed PV capacity was installed in 2017 and 2016, respectively.
A reason for this, according to Ugurel, is that a lot of the licensed projects face “huge problems with land development, environmental impact assessment”, among other issues.
Another problem, Ugurel adds, is that the first tender concerning the licenses for 600 MW of solar PV capacity, divided projects into “very” small plants, ranging from 5 MW to 10 MW each.
Most often, Ugurel tells pv magazine, big energy players are not interested in such small investments, since they don’t lead to a reasonable investment rate of return (IRR).
“Basically, as I have always said, the tender method [of the 600 MW PV capacity] was wrong and now we see the results.”
Other analysts have pointed out that successful projects in the 600 MW tender need to pay a one-time contribution fee per installed MW, and this fee, which was the result of the tender process, is often very high, thus leading to dormant projects.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
3 comments
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.