With a decision on the level of solar support in the U.K. expected "soon", according to a spokesman from the governments Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Solar Trade Association (STA) is concerned about plans to reduce support for medium (50 kW to 5 MW) and large-scale (5 MW+) installations through the Renewable Obligation Certificates (ROC) mechanism, in line with the rate of regression for small-scale solar FITs, and believes it is disingenuous to compare the costs of utility-scale projects with household installations.
In a response to DECCs consultation paper on the Renewable Obligation Banding Review, the STA said, "Once again the rug has been pulled from under the non-domestic solar market, despite remarkable achievements. This instability happens at a time when the FiT market is very weak.
"We disagree with both the figure of 1.5 ROCs and the methodology for arriving at this figure. We do not believe 1.5 ROCs to be based on sufficient evidence, indeed we understand from DECC officials that it was based on just two data points."
Under the ROC system, energy suppliers can fulfill their renewable energy obligations by presenting ROCs, with any shortfall prompting a payment into a central fund, which is then given back to energy providers according to the number of ROCs they presented.
Photovoltaic plants of 5 MW or more can currently generate 2 ROCs for each MWh generated, with mid-sized plants having the option of entering the ROC mechanism or using FITs reduced to just 7.1 pence by the U.K.s coalition government in July 2012.
DECC initially proposed removing the ROC option from installations below the 5 MW mark, thereby limiting them to the capacity-triggered FIT program and reducing the large-scale ROC allowance to 1.5/MWh, falling to 0.9 in the 2016-17 financial year.
The controversial proposal to remove mid-size plants from ROC eligibility has been removed, but the faster rate of regression in line with the FIT level remains, to the dismay of the STA.
The lobby group points out that large-scale installations have large staff costs and other overheads which homeowners fixing panels on their roof do not have to consider. These larger-scale investments are inherently more risky and deserve higher rewards accordingly, says the STA.
"To tie RO support to FiT bands therefore makes no sense," added the STA response to the banding consultation. "It would result in solar being greatly constrained even when it is much more cost-effective than other RO technologies. This is not the way to set RO band levels for solar."
The DECC was unable to supply a response to pv magazines questions at the time of going to press.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.